Why we watch scary films

-

Why we watch scary films 


The different theories:


  1. Dolf Zillman

Excitation-transfer theory purports that residual excitation from one stimulus will amplify the excitatory response to another stimulus, though the hedonic valences of the stimuli may differ. The excitation-transfer process is not limited to a single emotion.[2] For example, when watching a movie, a viewer may be angered by seeing the hero wronged by the villain, but this initial excitation may intensify the viewer's pleasure in witnessing the villain's punishment later. Thus, although the excitation from the original stimulus of seeing the hero wronged was cognitively accessed as anger, the excitation after the second stimulus of seeing the villain punished is cognitively assessed as pleasure, though part of the excitation from the second stimulus is residual from the first.

 

  1. Catharsis (from Greek κάθαρσις, katharsis, meaning "purification" or "cleansing" or "clarification") is the purification and purgation of emotions—particularly pity and fear—through art or any extreme change in emotion that results in renewal and restoration.

 

  1. SIGMUND FREUD

The Psychoanalytic community, including Sigmund Freud himself posited that horror came from the “Uncanny” – emergence of images and thoughts of the primitive id that were being suppressed by the civilized ego. Jung thought that horror movies tapped into primordial archetypes buried deep in our collective subconscious – images like shadow and mother play important role in the horror genre. 

 

  1. DAVID J. SKAL

Finally, DJ Skal posits that horror films are a reflection of our societal fears. Looking at the history of horror you have mutant monsters rising in 50s from our fear of the nuclear bogeyman, Zombies in the 60s with Vietnam, Nightmare on Elm Street as a mistrust in authority figures stemming from the Watergate scandals and Zombies again in the 2000s as a reflection of viral pandemic fears.

 

  1. Ernst Hartmann

Sees dreams as the brain’s sorting through the bits of information it’s gathered throughout the waking hours. But the images and connections we make while dreaming aren’t totally random, they’re guided by our emotions – maybe working through a recent trauma or dealing with angst and fear.

So perhaps watching a film is somewhere between being awake and being in a dream state. Much like play – films are a safe place where we can sort through stuff, learn skills to apply in everyday life. How do you defeat the a slow walking Jason Vorhees – you can’t outrun his slow stride. The only way is to face him straight on. Though a zombie apocalypse is a far fetched reality, the survivorship skills on display in a zombie horror film have some practical merit in our normal every-day world.

Horror movies require us to face the unknown – to understand it and make it less scary. They allow us to see our fears and put them into context, to play what if, and in doing so, they shape our belief systems, how we see each other and ourselves. They are a safe place to explore and for some just a good bit of fun.

 

 

 

 

Which of these five explanations do you agree with most and why?

 

I agree with the last explanation and the first explanation, the most. Firstly, Zillman discusses how we find pleasure in watching films, where the hero meets (unbeknownst) villain, but we know that the villain will defeat him sooner or later, therefore making us want to watch on. This I agree with because it’s true for most people. We find pleasure in watching the evil characters being defeated by the heroic characters and in the end, it’s a happy ending. The second explanation I agree with, is Ernst Hartmann’s theory. He dives into how horror movies give us practical skills for possible awakenings. It’s very well explained and it’s true as many people often wonder, how we’d survive if there was a zombie apocalypse or if aliens invaded earth, and such monstrosity of questions. These same questions have been the outcomes of horror movies and zombie movies. 

 

 

 

Can you provide any personal reasons why you think this?

 

Yes, somewhat. Most of the time, I also ponder about what I would do in the event of those same questions mentioned above, and then try and think of defensive tactics. It’s weird. 

 

Which one do you disagree with and why?

 

I don’t disagree with any of them, I think they are all equally right. They all explain the reasons pertaining as to why, but in different variations. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evaluation - 1

-
Image
Evaluation   1. How does your product use or challenge conventions and how does it represent social groups or issues? Narrative  Narrative of my film : a killer hidden in plain sight, in the position of love/caring, i.e. someone who we trust. My narrative is essentially a  well-known tailor with an alter ego of a serial killer, who kills by night, and is a tailor by day.  Their motive is not fully known, it’s rather personal and a mystery for the audience to uncode and discover. Her motive is past trauma, and her killings are a testament to her emerging from her trauma and growing. As compared to traditional Thriller openings, my opening features a serial killer who kills with a sharp, deadly object — this is conventional of the thriller openings, as most main characters are either murderers, serial killers, spies, etc, They who kill.  However, my character doesn’t kill with traditional weapons, but rather a needle, something they’re very familiar with and uses everyday, therefore imp
Read more

Credit Structure Analysis

-
Image
Credit Structure   The Task we had to carry out was to analyse the opening credits to identify what type of credits you get in a typical Hollywood film and in what order they are shown in, and therefore what should be included in our own opening titles.  Time Stamps: 1. Production credits i.e. the studios  2. Lead actors/actresses  3. Movie title  4. Supporting actors/actresses  5. Pre-production credits  6. Post-production credits  7. Cinematography, written and directed by (main production)  majority of the credits play for about 4-5 seconds
Read more

Target Audience

-
Image
  Target audience  The outfit  'The Outfit' is a movie based on a tailor who produces clothes for top end people, who also happen to be criminals of a large gang and in order to outsmart he needs to outsmart them. I chose to use this movie as my target audience research solely because it involves a tailor who makes custom clothes for the higher/upper classes, just as my own character does.  - Mostly males may watch this movie, as it has heavy gun artillery and lots of killings and blood. Equally, mainly men are the self-proclaimed, “antagonists”, and they carry guns and seems to try/do overpower the others.  - 25-34 year olds would watch this because they may go to the tailor  for custom-made clothing, rather than significantly older people.  -  The main lead is an old, male tailor, who makes suits and clothes accustomed to family gangs of crime.   - Mainly upper class persons account for 39% of the whole 68% of class, and are therefore more likely to watch the film as it has u
Read more